Are wood frame chairs more ergonomic than metal frame chairs?
The dictionary definition of ergonomic is ‘designed to be comfortable, safe, and efficient to use, especially in or as a work environment’, so when it comes to staff, patient and visitor seating in hospitals, comfort is key. Both metal and wood frames have their pros and cons, but how do we decide?
A crucial part of comfort is the armrest, which is often needed for treatments, diagnosis, and simply getting in and out of the chair. Armrests take a lot of pressure, and they need to be sturdy and easy to see, especially for those with limited movement or sight. Wooden armrests can wear down over time, exposing the wood underneath and raising concerns about infection control.
Upholstering the armrest can help, but it might not be as durable. Our solution? A custom armrest made from antibacterial, antimicrobial polyurethane. This material, combined with a metal frame, offers a much stronger and more reliable connection than wood.
For heavier chairs, adding small wheels to the rear legs makes moving them easier, and metal frames handle this better than wood. Plus, metal frames are stronger and more durable over time, with fewer weak spots compared to wood.
In short, while both materials have their place, metal frames tend to have better ergonomically designed features for a hospital setting.
It’s another close one, but metal chairs just edge the win in this round.
Wood 0 – 3 Metal